Carl Jung

Carl Jung

Carl Jung

In his book, Dawning of the Pagan Moon (1991), David Burnett wrote, “It is only by understanding Jungian psychology that the outsider will gain any appreciation of the rationale of the neopagan movement. Without it, the movement will appear a collection of exotic ideas and practices.” In Drawing Down the Moon, Margot Adler has documented that, by the 1970s, much of the Neo-Pagan community had adopted concepts from Jungian analytical psychology to explain a modern polytheistic belief in gods and goddesses.

“The Jungian conception that images of divinity and the sacred are representative of archetypes within the collective unconscious has given the neo-Pagan movement a conceptual framework within which it has been possible to accommodate polytheistic religious belief.”

Drawing on Jung, Adler wrote that the gods and goddesses of myth represented “real potencies and potentialities deep within the psyche, which, when allowed to flower permit us to be more fully human.”

In the 1970’s and 1980’s, the focus of Neo-Pagan attitude to history shifted away from claims of historical authenticity and became a search for images that evoked a strong sense of affinity and could be interpreted in terms of Jung’s theory of archetypes. As Adler explains, “The Old religion may not have existed geographically or historically but existed in the Jungian sense that people are tapping into a common source.”

David and Sharn Waldron explain Jungian Neo-Paganism thusly:

“From the perspective of Jungian-based neo-Pagan mythology, all symbolism and ritual serve as a metaphor of psychic development and the meaning and significance of these symbols is defined by their role as representations of the collective unconscious. Psychic development and human contentment cannot be achieved through will or intention alone. People require symbols and rituals to express realities beyond the scope of conscious thought in order to achieve wholeness. The collective unconscious, the wellspring of intentional and unintentional thought is, by definition, unknowable and cannot be grasped within the confines of conscious rational intent. The mediation of symbols is required to give a person’s psychological development meaning beyond that of the purely rational. From this perspective, when a Jungian-oriented neo-Pagan utilizes ritual, it is a metaphor to describe psychic realities in relation to certain archetypes, within the collective unconscious, they prescribe universal meaning to a person’s psychological state.”

Jung was a significant influence on several prominent leaders in the early Neo-Pagan community, including Frederick Adams, the founder of Feraferia, Margot Adler, author of Drawing Down the MoonStarhawk, author of The Spiral DanceJanet and Stewart Farrar, authors of The Witches’ Way, The Witches’ Goddess and The Witches’ God, and Vivianne Crowley, author of Wicca: The Old Religion in the New Age. In The Witches’ Way, the Farrars argue that it does not matter whether the gods are real, since their existence as archetypes in the collective human unconscious is beyond doubt. They define the purpose of Wicca as a religion to be the integration of conflicting aspects of the individual psyche and the individual psyche with the “Cosmic Psyche”. Similarly, Jungian analyst, Vivianne Crowley, describes Wicca as a Jungian mystery religion.

Related Pages:

The Sacralization of Psychology
Are the Neo-Pagan Gods real?

External Links:

“Jung and the Neo-Pagan Movement” by David and Sharn Waldron

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s